How can leaders lead when they don't know what to expect Essay

How can breaking winders lead when they dont know what to expect - Essay typeSimilarly setting a firm goal for the organization is one of the few essentials that must be adhered in practicing successful leadinghip. It is in this context that leaders, to be effective in implementing successful strategies, must obtain a succinct understanding of what to expect from their followers and benefactors of their leadership practices (Kerr & Jermier, 1978). Focusing on this argumentive statement, the aim of the stress is to evaluate the significance leaders competency to make accurate expectations when defining goals and implementing strategies likewise. In order to accomplish this particular aim, the essay emphasizes conducting a books review to gain an in-depth knowledge about the factors that determine leadership success in the 21st century context, followed by a case example abbreviation in respect to the Affordable Care Act policy enforced by the US President Mr. Barack Obama. Ba sed on the information obtained through these sections, a critical discussion has been conducted in this essay to derive a brief conclusion directly implying on the argument statement i.e. How can leaders lead when they dont know what to expect? The Concept and Role of Leadership in the 21st Century harmonize to Kaiser & Hogan (2005), although leadership has remained a topic of please for many years, and many researchers have contributed in the study of leadership, it still lacks a firm definition that can replicate its multidimensional features in an all-inclusive manner. According to Judge & et. al., (2002), it is because of the fact that leadership practices enumerate on situational contexts, where the qualities of the followers and the availability of resources play a vital role in determining overall leadership effectiveness also involving value-based philosophical attributes as major influences, defining the concept in a scientific way as similar to other societal concepts, becomes a major challenge. Nevertheless, almost all the explanations derived in the current phenomenon focus on one common feature of successful leadership that the effectiveness of these practices depend on the leaders ability to understand or decode the change needs and define their expectations accordingly (Judge & et. al., 2002). It is in this context that Fry (2003) argued leaders to be attending both the task oriented and social or emotional issues through the directive and corroborative behaviors, which further raises complexities in understanding the ability of the resources available and decide upon their expectations thereon. According to the House (1996), the contingency theory emphasizes that an effective leadership approach must have a link between the leaders behavior and the situational conditions that further determines their accuracy of expectations. Expanding the contingency theory, House (1996) further argued that the path-goal theory of leadership joins the part icipative and achievement oriented leaders behaviors with their directive and supportive behavioral needs to focus on the association amid performance-reward and explain the follower about the importance of such associations in order to perform