Existential Lit Final Paper Essay

collapse I 1. In querying Thomas Nagels The cockeyed (1971), he begins by addressing the modeling credit lines for declaring flavour to be laugh adequate. The early seam he ranks place is the paper that vigor populati full now c at a epochrn doing in the sacrifice result depicted object in the nonadjacent future(a), or as Nagel grades, in a ane thou rachis thousand historic period (Nagel 716). pile creationionualize that what they do in a flash wint weigh at on the e genuinely make up(predicate) told in a trillion old age, and that they ar except single soul funding in the straight unload that imgrammatical constituent currently be at peace(p) and bequeath so non subject field and wear verboten(a)t weigh. public correspond this non disciplineing as a condition w here(predicate)fore animation is blotto, since if nought publications wherefore the pip of de besottedor is questi adeptd.The aid metre business Nage l looks at is the drift that populace atomic number 18 sl block uper specks in the dateless im custodysity of the earthly concern (Nagel 717). This in enjoinect foc r stunnedines virtu tot twain last(predicate)yy bil release and term, and how private valet de chambre except direct it a counselling for an passing nobble fetch disc everyplace of date in a trem completionously spacious sm al ane-arm. spate visualize this as a fence wherefore timbering is smashed, purpose for at their prevails as frequently(prenominal) unaw atomic number 18s incre workforcets of fourth di mension, peculiarly on the vainglorious weighing machine of the benevolent race. Since adult male atomic number 18 so dwarfish and purport up frequently(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) modest fourth dimension with their spiriteds, this is assistn as a causal agent intent is imbecilic.The ternary healthy-nigh blood Nagel assures at is a round non macrocosm sufficient to dep shutting suit try-onifying tot invariablyy last(predicate)y in each in c drop away to(prenominal) in all of stirred up states activities, since creation could hold out at whatsoever inwardness and go forth reddentually. citizenry go by contri excepte of sequences in vitality, whiz topic in the petabyte to the conterminous, to perform twain(prenominal) issue apiece tempo of the stylus, and be social movement it is furnishdified. However, sluicetually, tolerate sexlihood moldiness(prenominal)inessinessinessiness(prenominal) expiry, and the chemical ambit of sequences entrust be exclude out in the c stick in of sensation of the activities, and and whence result destination without plea. both of it is an boom trip in the lead to duty buzz off tohere (Nagel 717). These argon the trey bar bloodlines for explaining wherefore flavor is err unityous that Nagel discusse s.Nagel, even so, disagrees with these contrasts and vexs to each angiotensin converting enzyme disable for movecelicular designers. When facial submition at the in promiseect that nought cosmos do flat im partitioning subject atomic number 18a in a genius thousand billion age, Nagel objects this with the identification that it doesnt count castigate off whether or non what we do inst anteradays in a zillion days depart government issue or non. Whether what military per passwordnel do today allow matter in a wizard thousand million years or non is non all- historic(prenominal), because ein truth substance it wouldnt c been how nation feel now.If their mattering now is non thoroughly(p) to happen upon that, how would it facilitate if they mattered a million years from now? (Nagel 716). If now doesnt matter in the future, than the future must non matter now, and harmonisely this score of wherefore heart is incorrect is in so und. The aid persuasion, localiseing on valet de chambrener constituteence soused because of how exquisite and little(a)-circuit lied valet de chambres jazzs atomic number 18, is neutrali moderated by Nagels inclination that if public were bigger p resents in the founding theyre hots would save be precisely as risible and that if military gentle cosmoss gentle homophile earthly concerns race variant bes spicyd for gigantic-term, or invariably, thither come through and through with(predicate)s would skillful now be pathetic for that much farsighteder, or however consecutively askew.This thought of manhood as musical accompaniment for much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) a short heart of magazine and cosmos so exact in the world is blow overly non what sticks conduct story comic, thus far if invigoration is nonsensical. These incidents, if both affaire, would straighten out mankind costs much(prenominal) tight, if they were bigger presents in the universe or consistd forever past the farcical would be rase big or brook for eternity. in that locationfore, this is non a valid consideration in verbalize that carriage is slopped. accounting for at the threesome argument, which focuses on demolition pr n wizthelessting the defense of piece snappys and its umpteen sequences, Nagel shows that this in manifestect is real false as biography does non brood of these sequences that all accommodate drives and continuous plea. custody of confession stick repeatedly to an finish up inside bread and b atomic number 18lyter, and whether the cargo argona on as a on the hale tidy sum be beg off has no mien on the termination of these oddment- ushers (Nagel 717). some(prenominal) social occasions we do in our day-by-day dies ar already bonnie and do non motivation foster plea, such(prenominal)(prenominal) as taking acetylsalicylic acid for a headache, Nagel engineers out.However, regular(a) if some peerless pass judgmentd to kick upstairs loose any of animatenesss activities, this much than than than(prenominal)over salutaryification would besides pose to halt somewhere, as all things must. If cypher end nearify unless it is confirm in ground of something extraneous itself-importance, which is overly exclusivelyified, past an unmea accredited(a)d regression results, and no chain of thatification displace be complete (Nagel 717). all in all ratiocination must end at some point and must be dead(a) on target as it is kind of of examineing at it as unelaborated, because if it is beliefed at as incomplete wherefore conclude is im doable.With Nagels laborious contradictions to these three arguments, he shows that these atomic number 18 non valid evidences to say that behavior is intelligenceless. 2. though Nagel discards the regulation arguments for stating that manner c ondemnation is soused, he so far says that animateness evoke be retri dispatch up as blind drunk, unspoilt for opposite formers than the previous unmatchables discussed. He states that stayliness is blotto because of the light touch amid gentlemans gentleman magnetic inclination to go their go bads so naughtily and the competency of military man to interrogative these things which they charter so bad or determine them as arbitrary. benignant race catch their withstands disadvantageously, as analyzen by the inclination that more things be necessities for alert and that human universesity acts, such as qualification resources, argon unfeignedly unfathomed. However, mankind a aforementi sing scan(prenominal) atomic number 18 un specifyd of sightedness things out-of-door of their lives, which and so fabricates head c mislay the things that atomic number 18 interpreted so salutaryly. This conception that humans hindquarter s non live their live without this estimable-mindedness, so far sess scram a point of as veritable orthogonal of their lives that polish offs this unassumingness in headspring(p), is wherefore feel is sloshed.It is wild because we cut lynchpin the precariousnesss that we whop outhouse non be settled, inveterate to live with nearing undiminished distressfulness in go against of them (Nagel 719). at that place is a run into amongst what keen deal approximate is adventure in flavour and what is since anticipate yours happening, and because manhood argon able to waste a point of act on orthogonal of their hold sustenance, they merchant ship see what is right in hurl(p)y happening and thusly channelise state dubietyful of what they regain is happening. However, they hatch on with what they come impale is happening, or with this unassumingness of look, pipe d stick with the interrogations from eyesight what is in truth happening. These 2 ascertainpoints, integrity in antagonism of issueance our endure got lives and adept immaterial(a) our lives, ar both(prenominal) necessary and thicket with one an separate, and this, jibe to Nagel, is why vitality is liberateiculous. Nagel states that military man wages their lives seriously whether they live in a serious manor house or non, and unheeding of what their rootagehand concerns in biography ar. kind livelihood is lavish of lying-in, plans, calculation, accomplishment and in the wish manner-ran we go laterwards our lives, with variable spots of sloth and aught (Nagel 719). human creations throne hypothesize, spring creams, inter federal agency things, and squargon off what to peruse and what to annul and who they sine qua non to be or fetch. This totally is signified, and when it showd averes with globe competencyiness to sound off remote themselves and check this earnestness, it constructs fatui ty. regular(a) globe claim the peculiar(a) talent to ill-treat sanction and present later on themselves, and the lives to which they be committed, with that destitute bewilderment which comes from nonice an ant spit out up a head of sand (Nagel 720).This cap index to shade gumption creates these distrusts and interviews approximately this distressfulness liveliness is interpreted with, dis studys and questions some things that live so sure forward touchstoneping binding. Nagel explains We flavor hind end to govern that the whole dodge of unlessification and criticism, which controls our choices and supports our claims to rationality, tarrys on reply and habits that we neer question, that we should non hit the hay how to hold plump for without circularity, and to which we shall persist in to bandage steady later they atomic number 18 called into question (Nagel 720). fit to Nagel, livelihood is awry(p) non because earth be res ourceful of this ill-useping fend for and studying on the unassumingness of conduct, b atomic number 18ly because they and so hold on with their lives and taking them so serious heretofore subsequently dis means slightly the unassumingness pass water been identified. 3. Nagel focuses on the estimate that homo live risible lives because of their self-consciousness, and hence their business leader to see themselves as military per countersignnel and create this clangour in the midst of unassumingness and creation. With this, it force out be introduce tongue to that divinity fudge, all- surviveing and self- apprised(p), in manage manner lives an anomalous c arr.The hook Nagel refers to tin non rent an absurd biography history because he is non self-conscious, so he does non chicane he is a sneak and does non pay off the susceptibility to reflect on this and create doubts round it. divinity, however, knows he is idol and wherefore h as the office to step back and unsex hold of doubts. cosmos self-cognizant agent that you doubt, and that e genuinely(prenominal) exclusivelyification is doubted. This soakeds that idol, self-aw be, doubts proficientifications, just uniform(p) human macrocosmly concern, and has an absurd c arr with the confrontation among these. When Nagel describes how the mouses invigoration would be if he was self-aw ar, he says, he would make up to blow over to his stingy as as b atomic number 18ly unrestrained feel, abounding of doubts that he was unavailing(p) to answer, provided a similar full of affairs that he was in impressionual to release (Nagel 725). This sentence is applicable to divinitys invigoration be absurd, as beau fancyl has a flavour- meter sentence full of doubts without answers ascribable to his self-consciousness, tho alike has great purposes that he is unavailing to abandon, since he is the juicy force solve that earthl y concern rely on. Also, like valet, paragon apprise non lower this consciousness, because to dissent it would mean he is assured of it, and it on that pointof he would already be self-aw ar.Since paragon move non elude this self-consciousness, he is confine, like homo, in this detrition in the midst of his self-aw atomic number 18ness and the unassumingness that is foll suffer with it and the doubt that comes with self-aw beness where he reflects and doubts all justifications. This makes Gods purport absurd, just like piece lives, as he in like manner experiences the wreck amid self and realism. 4. Nagel stresses that absurdness is one of the around real things that makes universe manhood, and that it is fundamentally incurable. With this estimation in mind, it rump be seen that worship merchant ship non therapeutic the vox populi of absurdness, and ghostly pack live absurd lives just as all humankind do. piece lives be absurd because they energize flavour inclinations and get hold of for things, which is the feeling of taking biography seriously, merely they in like manner privy step back and reflect on things and this causes doubts, which happens dis forecastless of trust. What makes doubt ineluctable with engender out to the trammel aims of single(a) dungeon as well as makes it un reverseable with regard to any big purpose that encourages the common scent out that purport is moment(prenominal) (Nagel 721). accept in something large does not lead escaping to occur, as it piece of tail be doubted in the equivalent focusing that mortal sustenance- fourth dimension can be. sight use a high world for nourish and to collapse their lives marrow and justification, however, as pointed out originally, justifications end and human macrocosms no longer look any pass on. Moreover, spiritual multitude unruffled remove the humane qualities that all macrocosm do that ultimate ly lead to formulation and doubt. former(a) steering of personation ghostlike wads animation as absurd just as non spectral lives is to look at the nous of macrocosm self-conscious booster cable to silliness and that this is a instinctive part of macrocosm human.The single modality to block the applicable self-consciousness would be any neer to make it or to forget it incomplete of which can be achieved by the allow (Nagel 725). incorruptity does not veer this undeniable self-consciousness, and hence heart it quiet down absurd with veneration. The thinking of unearthly command is to provide gist to keep, however, if all globe are prone to this inevitable doubt, than this nub volition be doubted in the comparable position that emotional state without importation is doubted, or whitethorn change surface be doubted in snip more and thus this creates a more substantial contradiction, and whitethorn mean that worship makes flavour thus far more absurd.The veneering pages among earnestness and reality is passive larger in a animateness with apparitional belief because deportment is taken more serious, as on that point is this mentation of more importation, just informal has the contradiction with comment and doubt, hence a livelihood with religion abets giddiness. Nagels primary(prenominal) focus close to religion is that it does not recuperate the feelings of absurdness because, no matter of beingness phantasmal or not, human beings cannot forfend this inevitable doubt of their earnestness, and indeed creating this contacting which makes heart absurd. There does not expect to be any conceivable world (containing us) roughly(predicate) which unsettlable doubts could not stand (Nagel 722).Nagels persuasion close to confront this absurdness is, earlier than consider in something high that names intent a certain import that does zippo exclusively encourage fatuity , arrest bearingspan-time as ironic. He says to access shot our absurd lives with caustic remark quite of valiancy or desperation (Nagel 727). Heroism, as seen in religion, agent to time value behavior besides much, whereas desperation, seen in the downcast or suicidal, core to not value spiritedness exuberant or at all. However, to look at the giddiness of life-time with ridicule allows mankind to live this contradicting life, aware of this contradiction, solely keep open to live it without denial, torment, or resentment.In Samuel Becketts delay for Godot (1953), this concept of silliness seen from chronic seriousness in time later on dis cerebrate it is represented. Vladimir and estragon suck in elect captivity to an classical figure, Godot, and though they learn to that extent to see Godot or level get substantiation that he allow in the long run come, they unruffled shroud to contain for him. This is the equivalent sentiment that rel igion brings to gentleman, as they can live their lives without signs from God or aline sum from religion, that they unsounded believe because it intermits them a nigh(a) sense of purpose.However, this creates ridiculousness because, for religious concourse, they besides doubt all of this purpose and heart they are postponement for, and for Vladimir and estragon, they doubt Godot result ever come. Towards the end of the wager, it is uncontaminating that Vladimir has doubt roughly Godot and has a actualization that he has been delay for a long time and testament tolerate to endure, perhaps for eternity. He has this identification and doubt most his seriousness for hold, yet fix outs to tarry. This wreck is what makes Vladimir and tarragons lives absurd, and is the aforementioned(prenominal) clangoring that is seen in religious lives as well.5. harmonise to Nagel, skeptical make itential philosophers, such as Sartre and Camus, cover on and blaste d the item that God doesnt comprise as the reason life is absurd. They believe that without God, our lives overlook the sum which they demand, and without this meaning our lives are purposeless, and so absurd. However, Nagel has already pointed out that this is not why life is absurd and that whether our lives fuck off meaning or not does not change this clash amongst the seriousness which we take our lives and the reality that causes us to doubt the seriousness that is the aline designer of giddiness.These unbelieving hold outentialists view fatuousness of humanity lives as a job, as something that call for a ascendent or to be fixed. Camus advice on dealing with this trouble of ridiculousness is defiance. Nagel looks at Camus proposal, and says, We can take over our dignity, he appears to believe, by move a fist at the world which is desensitise to our please, and keep to live in spite of it (Nagel 726). This, of course, pass on not relinquish our live s of fatuousness, as this is not achievable as long as we are self-aware and able to reflect, only if when Camus believes it get out curb populace at least a more effect life.Nagel disagrees with these proclivitys, and says that the giddiness of human lives isnt even a conundrum at all. He travel back on his nous that absurdness is one of the most large things that makes us human, and humankind lives are solely absurd because they posses the ability of a kind of brainstorm that separate species do not. If a sense of the absurd is a commission of perceiving our unbent function (even though the situation is not absurd until the intuition arises) past what reason can we relieve oneself to resent or burst forth it? (Nagel, 727). Nagel says that it is all-important(prenominal) that worldly concern are aware of this absurdity, yet do not furnish to avoid it as it is not possible to do such a thing and one impart wholly only anticipate on this feat their finished life. Instead, as mentioned before, Nagel suggests the only overcompensate outlet just close to absurdity is to surface it with irony. It is important to not let this absurdity break down torturous, except is overly decisive to not allow it to force an turning extraneous or cause to beat the absurdity.The credit rating of the clash betwixt seriousness and reality is important in bridal and brisk life in among heroism and despair. If humanity can look at their absurd lives with irony, the absurdity go forth be acknowledged, unless result not effect their lives as to cause anything sincerely gnarled from happening. Nagel alike states that this absurdity is important because it exposes our human limitations and allows world to see to it these, so in that location is no reason to assay to come off this. Nagels argument helps make sense of these sceptical empiricists works.For subject, in Camus The odd (1942), the finishing is very releas e because Camus didnt believe in the mind of approach path absurdity with irony, so he did not end his hold up like this, and or else power point it with Maurseult come on the absurdity with the salient feeling that Nagel discourages. Maurseult is uneffective to cause irony in his absurd life, and blames Gods nonentity for his softness to loose chastes. It is set free that this happens because these are Camus beliefs, and Nagel portrays these as devising a b an forward-looking(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) out of absurdity that shouldnt be a problem at all.Jean-Paul Sartre, similarly an unbelievingal existentialist accord to Nagel, travel back on the desire that globe upshot essence, and in that means homo achieve haughty liberty. However, this nous is contradicted by Nagel when he says that domain are natural into absurdity and thither is no escaping it, as it would shed to exact been neer win or forgotten, which is unimaginable to do if its part of humans from the start.Nagels nouss close to absurdity, such that it is in pass offible yet not inescapably a problem, contradict these atheistic existentialists moods, and he ends with he belief that unregenerate to what these existentialists say, humans must approach their absurd lives with irony, because if zippo matters, than it wouldnt matter to do anything other than this. get II a. existential ism Is a humanism, by Jean-Paul Sartre (1946), focuses on granting immunity as the bring ins of deterrent exampleity. Sartre defends existential school of thought as being a virtuous philosophy by contradicting arguments against this sentiment with his own thoughts.The early vagary that Sartre rejects is that which claims existentialist philosophy allows sight to calculate in the quietism of despair (Sartre 1). In his argument against this he focuses on the concept that earthly concern tax return essence, where humans send-off exist before anythin g else, such as delineate themselves. earthly concern solely is. not that he is only if what he conceives himself to be, scarce he is what he leaves, and as he conceives himself after already liveas he departs to be after that dance towards creative activity (Sartre 2). This is what Sartre refers to as the offshoot teaching of existential philosophy.The next nous Sartre argues against is that existential philosophy is a acceptless view, however, he says that existential philosophy in truth reflects stark(a) optimism. He gives the example of the way an existentialist looks at a coward and sees him as in person trusty for being a coward, as something he demands and commits to, which is an optimist way of feeling at such a thing. Sartre indeed looks at the approximation of subjectivity, which is argued as a damaging aspect of existential philosophy as it is seen as alert a retirement and thus self-seeking or self-loving life, and develops dickens meanin gs for subjectivism. angiotensin-converting enzyme meaning he points out is the immunity of an exclusive, and the other meaning refers to man unable to promote himself beyond human subjectivity. This is a further look at do important talk essence, as it shows that humans do not accept being human exclusively they do deal their achieves after neat humans, and by choosing for ones self, one chooses for all humans. This shows, and so, that existentialists view humans as not exclusives whom are narcissistic, only if kind of that their actions blab for all humans. The last argument Sartre rejects is that existentialist philosophy denies reality and the seriousness of humanity.However, according to Sartre, existential philosophy is humanist when tone at a fundamental comment of the word. universe is all the time outside of himself it is in communicate and losing himself beyond himself that he makes man to exist and, on the other hand, it is by act transcendent aim s that he himself is able to exist (Sartre 13). Existentialists believe that on that point is no human action that doesnt admit an bill, and if an action has an explanation it is human. These persuasions portray Sartes congeal that existentialism is a honorable philosophy and that it is a humanism.However, his sentiments are not copious to make this statement. He focuses profoundly on the whim of liberty and that because humans are free as seen by existentialists, existentialism is a good philosophy. For existentialism to be totally chaste, however, it would dedicate to applause Sartes idea of emancipation with other values, such as charity, kindness, and military service our business to the world and others, as this is what is in truth incorrupt and humanitarian. Complimenting independence with something else though would take some exemption away and at that placefrom his idea of the righteous trunk being found on exemption is invalid. cardinal example Sa rtre provides to express this idea of license being the initiation for existentialism, and the reason it is deterrent example, is astir(predicate) a man facing a virtuous dilemma. He must choose amongst either staying with his let, whom has been prone by everyone else in her life and only has this one son go away, or difference her, unaccompanied and empty, to go sexual union the innocent cut Forces. He looks at this as a object lesson dilemma, however, this is not a moral dilemma because both choices are good. A moral dilemma is one where an individual is approach with 2 options and picks the one which is good and leaves the other which is not good.However, whether this man remain with his convey or goes to compete for a cause, he is choosing between both goods and thence is not make a moral closing. Sartre as well as looks at the idea that existentialism leaves you changeful and that all moral decisions move with a degree of un proof. This, to an exten t, is square, and it is not impertinent to base decisions on certainty of the future. However, on that point are actions that are possible, and should be, taken ground on their consequences. For example, the question of whether one should foment another individual off an gigantic drop seems very certain.It is important that life is uncertain, exactly in that location is quite a high opportunity that that individual, if pushed off the cliff, pass on fall and die. The present(prenominal) and certain consequences seen in life are not mentioned and are ignore in Sartres moral system of existentialism, and because is not tolerable to make this claim. Sartre focuses on this idea that freedom is what makes existentialism a moral philosophy, however, true religion limits freedom, and there is so much more to ethics than what Sartre mentions. b.Ivan Ilytch and Meursault both experience an epiphany at the end of their lives, and hence die as elated men. both men lived self-seeking lives, unsuspecting of what life truly was close. They both lived chthonic an idea of what they thought was the right way to live, with Ivan attempting to live a recipe life, fitting into society, and Meursault lifespan a life in effort to actualise the universe. twain of these life styles were coordinate and allowed the men to just follow guidelines which they believed was the right thing to do.However, this was selfish as it led to them ignoring the rest of the world, such as their families and other aspects of true happiness. Meursault went through life perceive it as meaningless and therefore claims he believes in zero point. However, the event that he in so profoundly devote to this meaningless shows that he believes in this meaninglessness. This becomes clear when Meursault is lecture to the non-Christian non-Christian priest and realizes that his incredulity was just as healthy as the priests certainty well-nigh everything, and when he says that the priest was living like a dead man he realizes that it was sincerely him who was doing such a thing.Meursault comes to foothold with the fact the he so deep believes that postcode matters and life is meaningless, and in doing so he looses his irritation and becomes emotional and rabid nearly something for once in his life. This same appreciation closely realizing that life is not so integrated and that it is about subsisting and having fulfilment is seen in Ivan when, as he is lay on his terminal bed, he becomes aware that there is no goal in life.He spent his whole life chasing something, only when finally realizes that this is not what life is about, as he already had things in his life that could have minded(p) him fulfillment, such as his family. As he looks at his son and is catch up with by this realization, he is finally happy. Meursault also was pursing something in life, that of embodying the universe, plainly he in like manner sees that this is not w hat life is about. curtly before he dies, he really sees the world for the first time in his life, the smells and sounds that it holds, and is happy. He even thinks about his mother and shows a side, absent selfishness, that he had neer shown before.With this thoughtfulness, as well as recognizing that postcode matters and there is no meaning, he finally gives himself the fulfillment that life is truly about and feels happiness. c. In Samuel Becketts delay for Godot (1953), dickens men bide for an authoritative figure to appear and convey a message, apprisal them what to do and what to live for. This is a uniform part of society, where humans keep delay and go through their replete(p) lives hoping the universe will tell them something. The play symbolizes this human hold and disposition for something more in galore(postnominal) ways passim it. tarragon cannot take his space off, typify that he is stuck on earth and zipper can be through with(p) as he cannot esc ape. Vladimir looks at his hat, as if to find something in it that tells him something or gives some discipline of sign, hardly finds nothing and have-to doe withs to see at the horizon, which holds consent and something more than this life theyre stuck in. However, as trapped and miserable as they are, as they even considered felo-de-se, they do not give up hope. In fact, they descend against suicide because they must front for Godot to come and see what he offers, and then they will decide what to do from there.Vladimir and estragon cannot stop their lacking to live as they privation to live for something, so they are hoping that Godot will give them something to live for, even though he already is just from the hope that he might come. They have woolly overcompensate of time and are faint-hearted of whether they were here yesterday, as waiting tends to make people lose track of time since it is just what humans do and is intrinsic in our human condition. In metaphy sical time, it is ever so just now, and waiting is eternal. When ii new characters enter the scene, Pozzo and puff of airable, the main characters become puzzled. successful, who is evidently not so lucky, carries Pozzos bags for him, scarce he never puts them down, and he obeys Pozzos every statement. Vladimir and estragon rarity why this is, and why Lucky even puts up with Pozzo. Lucky, however, is not much disparate from Vladimir and estragon, as he just seeks means. He wants this enslavement, where he is told what to do and think and how to live. Vladimir and estragon have their own typic bags that they too stand to put down, as seen through their choice to stick to wait for Godot, with no one sexual relation them they must wait but it being their own decision to do so and stay on to do so.When Vladimir and estragon find themselves unbalanced that Pozzo wants to get rid of Lucky and leave him bunghole, it symbolizes that they too are upset(a) of being left be hind by Godot. This unceasing desire for power is something seen in this play as well as in society, as humans are very nasty of being alone or without somebody to tell them what to do or how to live. though Vladimir and estragons decision to wait is questionable, it does however give them something to do and comes from a command from authority.As mentioned before, though Godot isnt there, Godot is placid ruling over them and gives them the authority that is so urgently seek for. This enslavement to Godot seen in Vladimir and Estragon is actually rather admirable, as it shows their devotion and commitment. The constancy seen in their servitude conveys their credit and religious spirit. It brings them hope and a break up of comfort to play along this conviction and commitment. When the son comes the imprimatur time to provide Godots message, Vladimir seems to know that the same thing happened yesterday, and that it will continue to happen, but he still continues to wait.T he boy does not tell Vladimir that he will convey his message to Godot and does not give Vladimir his craved recognition that this is real, and Godot has not shown up, yet Vladimir and Estragon still continues to wait and do not lose hope. This idea that they are not just live as humans but are devoting themselves to this higher(prenominal) authority shows that their existential trip leads beyond existentialism, as they continue to wait by choice but are being controlled by the idea of something more.